This past weekend, we celebrated the feast of Christ the King. At least for me, it can be a bit of a confusing feast to make sense of. I often focus on what Christ did for me as His sacrifice, or look at Him for His example of how to life, but what does it mean to call Him a King? Perhaps it has to do with the fact that as an American, I’ve never lived under a king, and when I hear the word I think of people from by-gone ages or a monarch who no longer has any real political power, such as the English monarchy. But really, it’s a great feast.
It came about in the 1920s when the pope at the time, Pius IX, instituted the feast. This was the time when some shadows were creeping across Europe. Russia had fallen to the Reds, with the message being the secularism was the answer. Even in Europe, you had this message taking hold as dictators would old their message to trump that of the Church. People needed to focus on a different kind of King and Kingdom – Jesus Christ. Sir Thomas More said it best: I die the kings good servant, but God’s first.
And so what this feast does is help us look at how Christ leads. Center for me was how he showed forgiveness to those who killed Him (all of us) and to the Good Thief, who is in this account from the Gospel we heard this Sunday (http://www.usccb.org/nab/112110.shtml). Christ also shows sacrifice, through what He does in the Passion but through how He leads His life. These are two things that are difficult though for us all if you think about it. No one likes sacrifice; just look at the recent credit meltdown or how people use others for their own gain, such as what happened with Communism and totalitarianism and still happens all over the world. Forgiveness is something we ask for and try to give, but that’s tough business. How do you move past something that hurts?
These are themes I tried to address in my homily. I focused on the story of Lord Longford, an English lord who reached out to a woman that everyone in the UK loathed. His story was made into a film that won an Emmy and other awards, and while it’s on my Netflix queue I haven’t yet gotten it, but will. I do think it shows in many ways what a life looks like that tries to serve Christ the King.
Here’s the text of my homily from this past weekend. I hope you have a safe holiday too this week. As one who prefers the warmth of summer, here’s one note of cheer: just one month until the days start to increase again. Perhaps the archbishop would be open to me serving a parish in Florida or Southern California through March? Probably not, and I’d miss my family and friends too much, but winter really gets me down!
Oh well, God bless and have a safe and wonderful Thanksgiving and upcoming Advent and Christmas. The tree has been put up at the rectory with some lights thanks to some help from mom and dad, so while it’s cold outside at least the inside is warm and festive.
God bless! – Fr. Paul
******************************************************************************
Myra Hindley was one of the most notorious names in Britain in the 1960s, and for many years after that was a name that people thought about with disgust. It was over a two year period, from 1963 to 1965, that she and the man whom she was seeing took the lives of five children. When the two were apprehended, the press labeled her the most evil woman in Britain.
Obviously the public outcry over these crimes was intense, and were it not for the work of an English Lord, the name probably would have been forgotten, as the sentence of life had been handed down. However, her name would come up again and again over the years that followed, because a man by the name of Frank Pakenham, or Lord Longford, refused to see just a murderess, but a human being.
Longford, by all accounts, should have led the good life and not have much to worry about in the 1970s. He was born into a prosperous family, and while he had a difficult childhood in the shadow of an older brother and not receiving much affection from his mother, he went on to go to Oxford and graduate with honors. He went on to a career in politics, taking a seat in the House of Lords and working in government as a member of the Labor Party, including being a part of the cabinet from 1964 to 1968. In 1971 he was knighted. He also enjoyed a beautiful marriage to Elizabeth, who was apparently one of the most sought-after undergraduates at his college.
By the time the 1970s rolled around, he should have been entering retirement, but he refused to slow down. And while he could have probably gotten good publicity for doing social work and found safe projects that would have no controversy, that, apparently, just wasn’t his way. Instead, he became focused on something that no one really cared about: reforming the prison system and ministering to the convicted.
He first began to visit prisons in the 1930s, and well into late life he would go two to three times a week to visit people who had been abandoned. Tabloids called him an eccentric who got a kick out of contact with infamous killers, but more than likely it was his Catholic faith (to which he converted) that served as a reason for him doing this work. In the late 1980s, for instance, he was contacted by the solicitor for a young man who was convicted of a drug offense, who was dying in jail from Aids; his family wouldn’t even visit him. Longford was the only person to do this on multiple occasions, but he of course never got any headlines for that.
What did get him headlines, however, was his involvement with the notorious Hindley, which perplexed many people then and still does to this day, especially when one considers that when Hindley didn’t think he could secure her release, she really didn’t want much to do with him. He began visiting her, and part of what he worked for in prison reform was to turn the public’s attention away from just punishment, but to looking at the underlying causes of what led someone to commit a crime. In Hindley’s case, she suffered from a horrific childhood of abuse, where she learned violence and learned that violence was in some cases the only response. In one case, when a neighborhood 8-year old boy hurt her, her own father told her to go out and do the same to him. He got to know her story, and became gradually convinced that she had been rehabilitated and was no longer a threat to society. For this, he was labeled “Lord Wrongford” by the media, but he wouldn’t be bullied by the media. In fact, he fought back. He also met with the victims families, and felt the media was just fueling a hunger for revenge.
Hindley never was released. In fact, she was declared insane in 1985, and lived the rest of her years in a mental hospital, and while both her and Longford did meet, eventually she did not want to meet with him any longer. No one can say for certain whether or not she had been rehabilitated or was in fact, as some suggested, using Longford to secure her release; she died in 2002. And by in large, while there were some changes in the prison system, he was not successful in making the changes he had hoped for.
At a deeper level though, when I read his story, I have to wonder what is it that drove him on? The tabloids and British Press certainly were not his friends, and making friends with a convict certainly caused him troubles. On top of this, it’s at a point in his life where he could be enjoying retirement and no longer has to be involved in politics. But yet despite fierce opposition and even public ridicule, Longford remained firm in his convictions, because he believed in doing the right thing, even if it might not be the most popular message. Perhaps he was following the guidance of a monarch other than his queen, Elizabeth.
Today’s feast is, at least for me, has always been a little bit confusing. It ends the liturgical year, as a new one begins next week, but what do we mean when we speak of Christ’s kingship? I think what it comes down to is the kind of kingship that Christ shows us – one not of glory for oneself, but one that seeks glory for others through forgiveness, sacrifice and service. The key is to live each day trying to grow in living that kind of life, but that takes work, because the image of royalty tends to focus more on anything but those three things.
With sacrifice, it’s a word that’s not in vogue a whole lot. Take the economic messes of the past century. While we believe there should be equality for all, some have taken that to mean economic equality. So we had a credit meltdown where people and governments borrowed beyond their means to “keep up with the Joneses.” We also had good people justifying their sinful actions to use other people for their money because they told themselves they had a “right” to things. On a global scale, this thinking isn’t new. From the rise of Communism, which said the state has a right to what you produce, to the false lure of thinking that having possessions is what matters most, lost can be the notion of sacrifice – of working to obtain something.
To be sure, there are countless rags-to-riches stories of self-made millionaires, and while there’s nothing wrong with having possessions or saving up to get something we want, we also should strive to sacrifice to get something we hopefully all want – the heavenly kingdom. Pope Saint Leo the Great asked, “For what could be more royal than a soul which by subjecting itself to God becomes ruler of it’s own body?” This is what our King, Jesus did, when He lays down His life. He does not understand the plan of the Father, but still He trusts, and while He may have the power to walk away, He chooses to give us all redemption, and the ultimate sign of what love is all about.
The problem though is more and more, that message can be lost in a world that tells us to seek our own glory. There is much good in the world, but ultimate glory can’t be found here. (What good is it to gain the world and lose eternal life?) Kings and queens might make some ink when they get engaged, but they don’t hold much political power in many countries anymore. And those who do are, as we see each election cycle, voted in and popular one minute and unpopular the next. To stay in power, they often can’t speak the truth. I’ve yet to hear any politician using the word “sacrifice” as a way of erasing debts and improving the economy. That’s understandable; politicians want to stay in office. But thankfully, Jesus didn’t just tell us what we wanted to hear in his kingship – he both talked the talk and walked the walk, as we see in this Gospel.
Through the sacrifice of our King, the world was redeemed. And while we probably won’t be called to lay down our lives for our faith, over a lifetime we will be called to make sacrifices. What we need to get away from is thinking sacrifice is a very negative thing. One of my favorite verses is from John’s Gospel, John 12:24: “…unless a grain of wheat falls to the ground and dies, it remains just a grain of wheat; but if it dies, it produces much fruit.” What I think of here is a willingness to die to self, to let something go for the greater good. Growing up, we might put away our allowance which is hard to see the money vanish into this building called a bank, but later on we can afford to buy a bike on our own. But on a larger level, we need to always be willing to sacrifice like Christ our King to make ourselves and one another better. Mother Teresa often said: “Love until it hurts,” meaning get away from the love of self-interest that looks inward, but embrace the love that looks outward. And so, if we are going to take this feast to heart, the question for us is a bit of the same one we should ask ourselves every Ash Wednesday: what am I going to sacrifice in my life for the greater good? As I shard a couple of weeks back, the greatest compliment I think any of us can get is to stand one day before God and see a loved one in heaven who says to us “I am here this day because you helped me to find the way here.” We do that through how we lead our lives. A child may save up their allowance not for a new bike but to get his mom something nice for her birthday; a teen may choose, instead of going out with their friends on Friday, to stay in with the family; a parent may choose to sacrifice of their time as well to be with their kids. At the time, it may seem like a difficult choice, but we make sacrifices to help make ourselves and others better. We also can do so much to set an example for others through sacrifice. Longford sacrificed pride and good press because he wanted to show people that forgiveness was possible and there could be goodness in even people who society might say have no redeeming quality, and for it he got no thanks save for a kind obituary in the Times of London. But over our lives, we can set such an example by helping people understand what matters most. I’m reminded every day of this, quite literally, when I look at a small church that sits on my bookshelf. It was made by my grandma Pat, but is just one of countless such things that she made by yarn for me and others in the family. Whenever I’d visit her, she’d often be spending time knitting, only to get up and offer you something to eat or drink, because that was just her way. She wanted our family to have something that brought them a little bit of joy, and that was her way of saying “I love you,” which she did in word and deed. The good news is you don’t have to know how to thread a needle to do that, but we can do that in so many ways through the testament of our lives. I look at that little church not just as a nice thing to go with the décor of my office, but as a symbol that is a reminder to me of my potential to live as she did by putting others first, and as a reminder that sacrifice may entail some short term difficulty, but can do so much good for ourselves and one another if we see something through.
One of the most difficult things to see through though if you think about can be forgiveness, which is the other trait we see shown by Christ the King. In Luke’s account of the Passion, in a very touching moment, He forgives instantly the good thief who has turned from his way of life. He also forgives the crowds who don’t even ask for forgiveness. Personally, I would find it very hard to forgive like that, and I think most people would be in the same boat. A while back, I shared the story of Vicar Julie Nicholson. She lost her daughter in the terrorist attack on the London underground in 2005. She had been serving as a vicar at an inner-city parish in London. She and her husband Greg were on a vacation in Wales, and found out that her daughter had been murdered when a terrorist bomb went off in a London subway. She took a leave from her ministry, and even decided to leave the priesthood, and stay involved in her church in a non-ordained way, leading an arts program. Why so drastic a step? In her words, “Its very difficult for me to stand behind an altar and celebrate the Eucharist, and lead people in words of peace and reconciliation and forgiveness when I feel very far from that myself.” Seeing what she did, her friend, also an Anglican priest, Ruth Scott, commented that she could not “help thinking that she is now more qualified to be a priest than she was before the tragedy” because the path she has chosen to take “challenges all Christians to reflect more deeply and sensitively about those words that we say every week – ‘forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.’ Its a good point, because forgiveness is really a process, and that’s something that Vicar Nicholson understands. Sometimes people feel pressured to forgive too quickly; other times something is so hurtful it is just buried far away, but by embracing the process of forgiveness, it can be liberating not just for the person who wronged us but for ourselves, too. Janis Spring, a psychologist, points out that a good first step is to acknowledge what we are feeling, which means confronting the anger and it has to be released. That means acknowledging that we were hurt and are angry, rather than bottling it up. Sometimes I even point this out in a wedding homily, pointing out there’s a difference between rage and resentment and using cruel words and actions towards legitimate disagreement where a couple has a healthy argument. One priest friend told me some of the healthiest couples he knows are those who argue every once in a while. So that first step is realizing what we are going through, and being honest with what we are feeling – and it may mean we stay at that step for a while, as Vicar Nicholson did. We gradually then move on to praying about the situation, letting God know about it (as if He doesn’t know anyway) in our prayer life, telling him our raw emotions and asking Him to help us take the steps toward healing and reconciliation. We also can turn to others for help through the situation by talking about a hurtful situation with a loved one. And, as we do this, we can move away from being a victim to being someone who understands. Ruth Scott, also an Episcopal priest, points out that as this happens, “if we are not to remain victims, we have to go eventually beyond condemnation to understanding what has happened, why it happened, how it has impacted us and what we can do to free ourselves to be someone whose identity is more than that of being the victim of a particular tragedy.” It’s an important process, and sometimes it can take many years. We shouldn’t feel bad about wanting justice – for even in confession when someone confesses stealing something, the priest, while not wanting them to reveal their conscience, may encourage them to try to pay back what was stolen in some way. We should demand justice. But we also need to work on trying to demand mercy. Like I said, I work for Jesus and try to be like Him, but were I Him in the cross, I really don’t think I could say “Father, forgive them.” In life people may treat us like Jesus was treated, and we will get hurt. It can be tempting to bury that hurt far away, or, even worse, to lie and say “all is right” when it’s really not alright, and we are still hurt and angry at an individual, and let that anger fester or use it as an ace up our sleeve for when we get into an argument with that person down the road. Forgiveness, much like sacrifice, can be painful, but, like sacrifice, it can also lead to liberation, and hopefully we never fear striving to embrace it, mindful that the process can take a long time.
Peter Stanford is an English writer who profiled Lord Longford, and looked at how he worked toward teaching people to forgive. He points out that “we cannot quite rise to the challenge of forgiveness. Rather than seek to understand why many criminals offend, we prefer to label them evil. Rather than accept their remorse, we prefer to suspect them of manipulating us into feeling sorry for them (as happened in Longford’s case).” The same is true with sacrifice – it’s hard to rise to that challenge when it’s so easy to go down the path of self-interest like so many kings have done throughout the ages, and easy to stay locked in bitterness or anger when we are wronged but more difficult to confront and try to gradually work past the raw emotions we are feeling.
People who have shown a remarkable ability to this are the Amish. Marie Roberts is the wife of Charles Carl Roberts, the man who took the lives of five children when he went into an Amish school in Pennsylvania before taking his own life. In the midst of this tragedy and their pain, the Amish community reached out to Marie, and publicly forgave her husband. In a statement, she thanked the Amish community for what they did. In her words, “Your love for our family has helped to provide the healing we so desperately need. Your compassion has reached beyond our family, beyond our community, and is changing our world.” Through His kingship, and how He lived, Christ changed the world by laying down His life for us, but also through showing us how to live – in a way where the focus is on the other person and helping one another to become better through lives of love and service even when both are difficult. Saint Paul, in our second reading, states that Jesus is the “image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation.” Christ does not physically walk this earth anymore, and while He is there in the Eucharist and present in the world, many people choose not to see Him. And even among people who may say they are Christian, we find that as life goes on living as He taught us is tough. No one here is going to be a king or queen, but hopefully we all aspire to be part of the heavenly court. This side of heaven, it’s a fact that as people wronged Christ people will wrong us too – and anger and frustration are appropriate, as is justice. It’s also a fact that one can’t give what they don’t have, and love also needs to be received – including self-love, and taking time for vacations or enjoying the fruits of life by owning possessions. The difference though between the person who focuses on heaven and the person who just can’t see God is one is willing to move past anger and not let it become a cycle of hate; the other lets the past become crippling and refuses to let go. One may have money in the bank and stuff in the house, but makes time for loved ones and realizes there are more important things than getting a gold name plate on a corner office; the other just gradually sets out to be a modern-day Napoleon and crown themselves king or queen of their own little world. William Longford, having everything in life, decided he needed to bring God’s love to a prison cell to a person whom everyone in the world seemed to despise, and for it he got no praise during his lifetime, rumors spread about him in the tabloids, and even little thanks from the person who he was trying to help. But through his forgiveness and reaching out, he also did something that’s so important for anyone who claims to be a Christian to do: he showed that he served first not the Queen of England, but the King of Heaven, and did exactly what Christ did for the Good Thief through the testament of His life. Hopefully our lives are led trying to do the same thing for one another, mindful that the most incredible thing we can do for someone isn’t to make the perfect turkey or find the perfect gift, but help them to find the way to heaven.